![[G]oody^^ Avatar](http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/8499/bubbleava6fg8.gif)
Post by [G]oody^^ on Dec 3, 2006 7:15:43 GMT -5
A while ago a heated debate started about how far freedom of speech should go concerning religion. On one side are people who argue that freedom of speech is absolute and should not be limited in any way. On the other side it's argued that freedom of speech should be limited to protect people from insults and hate. The latter for example reprimand the Danish newspaper that ridiculed Islam.
So what's your opinion? Should freedom of speech be an absolute right, or should it be limited when religious people feel insulted?
So what's your opinion? Should freedom of speech be an absolute right, or should it be limited when religious people feel insulted?
